Berkeley Burke SIPP (PO-8922)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mrs Y’s complaint and no further action is required by Berkeley Burke
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mrs Y has complained that Berkeley Burke failed to supply her with her client file and failed in their duty of care to her in that they did not carry out proper due diligence with regard to her proposed investment in GFI Teak.
She asks for a full refund of all fees, a full refund of the money she transferred in to the SIPP together with interest, and further redress for the distress and inconvenience she has been caused.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- AJC2 Pension Scheme (CAS-53044-T5K7, CAS-55238-T3N4, CAS-57583-H5G0)Complainant: Mr R, Mr N, Mr ORespondent: Mr Christopher Hoole, Trustee of the AJC2 Pension SchemeOutcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: Breach of trustRef: CAS-53044-T5K7, CAS-55238-T3N4, CAS-57583-H5G0Date:
- Optimum Retirement Benefit Plan (CAS-80110-K1M0)Complainant: Dalriada Trustees Limited (company number NI 38344) (Dalriada) and Mr ERespondent: Mr Gordon Craig (in his capacity as a trustee of the Scheme); and Mr Martin Kelly and Mr Gerard Reilly (in their capacity as former trustees of the Scheme) (the Trustees)
DalriadaOutcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: Breach of trustRef: CAS-80110-K1M0Date: