Local Government Pension Scheme (PO-2595)
Subject
Mr Jones has complained that Ealing have failed to fulfil their obligations under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (TUPE) legislation and associated statutory provisions with regards to his pension; namely, the , the Code of Practice on Workforce Matters in Local Authority Service Contracts and the Cabinet Office Statement of Practice.
The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons
The complaint should be upheld against Ealing because they did not adhere to the provisions of the when Mr Jones’ employment transferred to Lambert Smith Hampton.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- ReAssure Personal Pension Plan (CAS-53873-S2G7)Complainant: Mr IRespondent: ReAssure LimitedOutcome: Partly upheldComplaint Topic: Benefits: incorrect calculationRef: CAS-53873-S2G7Date:
- The Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (CAS-100357-F0Y8)Complainant: Mr YRespondent: Cabinet Office
MyCSP
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Benefits: incorrect calculationRef: CAS-100357-F0Y8Date: