The Lifetime SIPP (PO-3015)
Subject
Mr Barnett’s complaint is that Hartley failed to properly administer the Plan. In particular he says that Hartley failed to flag the non-payment of rent in respect of Consort House (the Property).
The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons
The complaint should not be upheld against Hartley because they were not primarily liable for any loss to Mr Barnett. Much of the loss that Mr Barnett claims was not directly attributable to the failure to identify that the Tenant was not paying rent
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Rowanmoor SSAS - Blick Horsham Limited Executive Pension Scheme (CAS-44560-Q1C8)Complainant: Mr KRespondent: Rowanmoor Group plc (Rowanmoor), including specifically its subsidiary
Rowanmoor Trustees Limited (RTL)Outcome: Partly upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-44560-Q1C8Date: - Westerby Private Pension (CAS-57893-P0C6)Complainant: Mr YRespondent: Westerby Trustee Services LimitedOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-57893-P0C6Date: