Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Miss H’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £1,786.53 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Miss H is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs E’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, ReAssure shall reconsider its decision about the distribution of death benefits under the Scheme in accordance with the New Rules.

ReAssure shall also pay Mrs E £1,000 for the serious distress and inconvenience caused to her.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall enrol Mr N into a new account in the Plan and ensure that it pays £1,855.35 in unpaid pension contributions.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs L’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £1,401.53 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mrs L is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it will arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr D’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the First, Second, Third and Fourth Respondents (the Respondents) shall pay the missing contributions in respect of his pension and make good any shortfall in units. 

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Having fully considered the evidence and submissions presented in writing and at the Oral Hearing, I uphold the Applicants’ complaints. 

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Miss N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £2,083.84 into her Scheme account. The Employer shall ensure that Miss N is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr D’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £3,613.48 into the Scheme. The Employer shall also ensure that Mr D is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr E’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £1,898.61 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr E is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it will arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Miss S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, Dapa Coffee shall pay Miss S £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience she has experienced.