Skip to main content

Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PO-8048)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr N’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right the Trustee should pay Mr N £2,000 for its failure to reply to Mr N and MyCSP should pay £500 for the distress and inconvenience caused.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Golley Slater Group Pension Scheme (PO-10450)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Complaint Summary

Mr N has complained that the Trustee has wrongly reassessed his benefit entitlement, which has led to him being paid a lower pension.

Summary of the Ombudsman’s Determination and reasons

The complaint should be upheld against the Trustee and Employer as a contract is in place for Mr N’s benefits to be paid on a years and months basis.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Local Government Pension Scheme (PO-13071)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs Y’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right the Council shall review its original decision to award Mrs Y Tier 3 ill-health pension benefits.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mrs Y’s complaint against the Council is that its decision to refuse to pay her a Tier 1 ill-health retirement pension (IHRP), was flawed.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Principality Pension Scheme SSAS (PO-12569)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Complaint Summary

Mrs S’s complaint against James Hay and the Member Trustees, is about the delay in paying her the benefits she is entitled to under the Scheme following the death of her late husband.

Summary of the Ombudsman’s Determination and reasons

The complaint should not be upheld against James Hay and Mrs Glenna Dunlop, but it should be upheld against Mr Stephen Dunlop, Mrs Helen Dunlop and Mr Gary Dunlop because:

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Local Government Pension Scheme (PO-14013)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr E’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right the Police shall review Mr E’s ill health application afresh, as though it were October 2014, with the assistance of a new independent registered medical practitioner (IRMP). In addition, the Council and the Police shall each pay Mr E £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience that he has suffered.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Dr O’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right NHS BSA should establish any loss she may have suffered had she contributed to a stakeholder plan rather than the Scheme. The Trust is not required to do anything further.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Dr O has complained that she should not have been allowed to re-join the Scheme as she was ineligible.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr A’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right the Trustee should review the decision not to pay Mr A’s ill-health pension benefits.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr A’s complaint against the Trustee is that its review of its original decision not to award him ill health pension from active service.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs K’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right, BSUH should pay Mrs K £1,000 in respect of the significant distress and inconvenience it caused.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Local Government Pension Scheme (PO-12797)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr N’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right CCC should review its decision with regard to his award of Tier 2 benefits.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr N has complained that CCC failed to consider his eligibility for Tier 1 ill health retirement benefits in a proper manner.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Local Government Pension Scheme (PO-17599)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr Y’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right GMPF should consider wholly afresh whether the death grant should be paid to the Estate. GMPF should also pay Mr Y £500 to recognise the distress and inconvenience caused to him.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr Y disagrees with the decision of the GMPF not to award him and his wife the death in service benefit following the death of his son, and the decision to award the death grant to the Estate.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Upheld