Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr I’s complaint and no further action is required by Teachers’ Pensions.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr I says, following the death of his grandmother, Mrs A, he acted on incorrect information provided by Teachers’ Pensions and personally paid back an amount of overpaid pension. The money should instead have been deducted from the short term pension payable to her spouse.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr H’s complaint and no further action is required by NEST.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr H has complained that NEST failed to provide information about the restrictions on his ability to opt-out of the Scheme when he was auto-enrolled in July 2013. He subsequently missed the opt-out deadline, and only found out recently that he was unable to transfer his pension to another provider until age 55.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr N’s complaint is upheld, and to put matters right FP should answer Mr N’s queries about the Plan and assist him in exercising any statutory right to a transfer out of the Plan to a named pension arrangement that is willing to accept it, if he so wishes. FP should also pay Mr N £2,500 to reflect the significant distress and inconvenience caused to him by its maladministration.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ms N’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right Tesla should pay her £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience caused by its maladministration.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Ms N’s complaint is that Tesla failed to pay the compensation it agreed to pay in respect of a previous complaint which she brought to this office, under reference PO-12111.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs N’s complaint against MyCSP is partly upheld, but there is a part of the complaint I do not agree with. To put matters right, for the part that is upheld, MyCSP should pay Mrs N £500 for significant distress and inconvenience.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mrs N’s complaint against MyCSP is about the incorrect information she received in 2006 regarding transferring benefits from a previous pension into the Scheme.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mrs S’ complaint and no further action is required by Wirral Council.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mrs S has complained that Wirral Council, the administering authority, have said she is not able to take her benefits as a trivial commutation payment in accordance with the de minimis rules.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr N’s complaint and no further action is required by NHSBSA.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr N’s complaint is that he believes he is paying tax at a higher rate than he should be, and that this is due to NHSBSA not following his written instructions.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mrs S’ complaint and no further action is required by Wirral Council.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mrs S has complained that Wirral Council, the administering authority, have said she is not able to take her benefits as a trivial commutation payment in accordance with the de minimis rules.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr P’s complaint and no further action is required by Aviva
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr P has complained that Aviva has refused to honour the contract he has for pension increases at 3% a year to be applied to the pension.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr E’s complaint and no further action is required by Aviva UK Life

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr E has complained that Aviva have refused to honour the contract he has for pension increases at 5% a year to be applied to the pension.