Skip to main content
Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Complaint Summary

Mrs T complains that NHSBSA incorrectly decided not to award her Mental Health Officer (MHO) status for parts of her NHS service because the criteria upon which their decision was made are “unclear, unfair, confusing and contradictory”. She considers that she should have been awarded MHO status because:

View determination

Download

Related decisions

ICL Group Pension Plan (PO-14440)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr O’s complaint and no further action is required by the Trustee.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr O’s complaint against the Trustee is about its decision to backdate a change to the ‘Late Retirement Factor’ (LRF) that is applied to an element of his entitlement.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

ICL Group Pension Plan (PO-14177)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr N’s complaint and no further action is required by the Trustee.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr N’s complaint against the Trustee is about its decision to backdate a change to the ‘Late Retirement Factor’ (LRF) that is applied to an element of his entitlement.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

 Complaint Summary

Mrs H’s complaint against NHSBSA is about the decision that she was not eligible to take her benefits early under the Special Class Status (SCS) terms of the Scheme. Her complaint against  STH is that they gave her misleading information about her entitlement to continuing SCS status while on secondment on which she relied when deciding to retire.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mrs N’s complaint.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mrs N is complaining that City Hospitals, her employer, did not inform Mrs N that she would lose her Special-Class Status, (SCS), when she moved to a managerial role in 2003. She says that she received her pension projections in 2011, however there was no mention that her SCS had changed.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

The Unite Pension Scheme (PO-9208, 9259 and 9293)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Applicants’ complaints and no further action is required by the Union and the Trustee.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

The Applicants’ complaints against the Union and the Trustee concern the refusal to award an increase in 2013 on that part of their pension accrued prior to 6 April 1997.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Citigroup Global Markets Ltd Pension & Life Assurance Scheme (PO-10421)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr T’s complaint.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr T is complaining that the Trustee has amended the Late Retirement Factors (LRF), applied to his pension benefits, contrary to an agreement with Salomon Brothers in 1990 (the Letter). The Letter promised that Mr T’s pension benefits would be underpinned in relation to his former pension scheme with Merrill Lynch (ML). The letter stated:

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Local Government Pension Scheme (PO-7277)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Appeal outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Complaint summary

Mr A has complained that the Council, his former employer, is wrongfully withholding his pension benefits.

Summary of the Ombudsman’s determination and reasons

The complaint should be upheld against Enfield Council because the legislation in question does not allow for them to withhold Mr A’s pension rights, in the manner they have.

 

 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Police Pension Scheme (PO-11805)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr H’s complaint and no further action is required by Warwickshire Police.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr H’s complaint against Warwickshire Police is that it has refused his request for the early payment of his deferred pension.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

ICL Group Pension Plan (PO-16406)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Ms N’s complaint and no further action is required by the Trustees.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Ms N’s complaint against the Trustees is that they improperly backdated a change to the late retirement factor (LRF) applicable to part of the pension available to her from the Plan without any advance notice and this has had a detrimental effect on her retirement benefits.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Interpretation of scheme rules/policy terms