Financial Assistance Scheme (PPFO-4050)
Summary of the application
The Ombudsman has received an appeal against a decision made by the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) as Scheme Manager of the Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS) under the FAS internal review procedure. The appeal concerns the calculation of Mr Ogborne’s “expected pension” by reference to the amount of annuity which was secured for him out of the assets of his former pension scheme on winding up.
Summary of the Ombudsman’s determination and reasons
The Scheme Manager’s decision was correct and Mr Ogborne’s “expected pension” has been correctly calculated.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Eleven Property Pension Scheme, SHK Property Services Pension, Gilbert Trading Pension Scheme (CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5)Complainant: Ms Y, Mr S, Mr E, Mr Y, Mr GRespondent: Brambles Administration Limited (Brambles)
Mr Simon Hamilton Kaigh
Mr Michael McNally
Eleven Property Limited (Eleven Property)
SHK Property Services Limited (SHK Property Services)
Gilbert Trading Limited (Gilbert Trading)Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5Date: - Liverpool Victoria (LV=) SIPP (CAS-50479-K7G0)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: LV=Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-50479-K7G0Date: