Kier Group Pension Scheme (PO-11670)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Ms D’s complaint and no further action is required by the Trustees.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Ms D has complained that the Trustees have not correctly considered the apportionment of Mr E’s death in service lump sum (the lump sum). Ms D feels that the Trustees have not put enough weight upon her dependency on Mr E, her relationship with Mr E, the nomination form, or her ill health.
Ms D feels that she has been discriminated against because she and Mr E were not married, and believes that if they had been she would have received 100% of the lump sum.
She believes that Mr E’s three children are entitled to something, but that 50% of the lump sum split equally between them is too high and that awarding 80% to her and 20% split equally between the children would have been more appropriate. Ms D has also questioned whether the adult children should qualify as beneficiaries as they are no longer legally children.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Transport for London Pension Fund (CAS-101454-H6B5)Complainant: Mrs NRespondent: TfL Trustee Company LimitedOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Death benefitsRef: CAS-101454-H6B5Date:
- AJ Bell You invest Self Invested Personal Pension (CAS-64304-R5R1)Complainant: Mr TRespondent: AJ BellOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Death benefitsRef: CAS-64304-R5R1Date: