Aviva Section 32 Policy (PO-13538)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mr N’s complaint against Aviva is partly upheld, but there is a part of the complaint I do not agree with. To put matters right (for the part that is upheld) Aviva should pay Mr N £1,000 for distress and inconvenience.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mr N believes that the transfer value Aviva have paid does not represent the true value of the Policy.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Fidelity FundsNetwork Pension (CAS-80719-C0S5)Complainant: Mrs WRespondent: Fidelity InternationalOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-80719-C0S5Date:
- Phoenix Life Personal Pension Plan (CAS-56595-R8D7)Complainant: Mr HRespondent: Phoenix Life Assurance LimitedOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-56595-R8D7Date: