Local Government Pension Scheme (PO-17262)
2. the London Borough of Bromley (the Council)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Ms E’s complaint is partly upheld, but there is a part of the complaint I do not agree with. To put matters right, the Council should compensate her for the non-financial loss she has suffered.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Ms E says that she was not previously made aware of any restrictions to transfer out after her 59th birthday. As a result, she was unable to make informed financial decisions about her pension.
Ms E says the Council and Liberata, the administrators of the Scheme, failed to provide information about her pension, and gave incorrect information – she was quoted a cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) in January 2016. She was then advised that she no longer had a right to take a CETV.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- ReAssure Pension (Group Stakeholder Pension Plan) (CAS-90949-P2D1)Complainant: Mr SRespondent: ReAssureOutcome: Partly upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-90949-P2D1Date:
- TPS Benefits Scheme (CAS-95270-P0X8)Complainant: Dr HRespondent: Trustees of the TPS Benefits Scheme
Buck Consulting
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-95270-P0X8Date: