Local Government Pension Scheme (PO-17262)
2. the London Borough of Bromley (the Council)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Ms E’s complaint is partly upheld, but there is a part of the complaint I do not agree with. To put matters right, the Council should compensate her for the non-financial loss she has suffered.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Ms E says that she was not previously made aware of any restrictions to transfer out after her 59th birthday. As a result, she was unable to make informed financial decisions about her pension.
Ms E says the Council and Liberata, the administrators of the Scheme, failed to provide information about her pension, and gave incorrect information – she was quoted a cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) in January 2016. She was then advised that she no longer had a right to take a CETV.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Lindab Limited Group Stakeholder Pension Plan (CAS-82642-K3R2)Complainant: Mrs YRespondent: Royal LondonOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-82642-K3R2Date:
- Ford Hourly Paid Contributory Pension Fund (CAS-88424-G5R6)Complainant: Mr ERespondent: The Trustees of Ford Hourly Paid Contributory Pension Fund
Mercer
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-88424-G5R6Date: