The Pension Protection Fund (PPFO-13591)
Complainant: Mr S
Complaint Topic: Other
Ref: PPFO-13591
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: The Board of the PPF
Type: Pensions Protection Fund referral
Date:
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mr S’ referral of a reviewable matter and no further action is required by the Board.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Application summary
The PPFO has received a reference of a reviewable matter, following a decision by the Board’s Reconsideration Committee dated 15 June 2016. The referral concerns:-
- The allocation of all of Mr S’ pensionable service to Metroplant Limited.
- The assessment period start date for the Metroplant section.
- Notification delays.
- Biased procedures.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- NHS Pension Scheme (CAS-58918-R9V9)Complainant: Mr ERespondent: NHS Business Services AuthorityOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-58918-R9V9Date:
- Eleven Property Pension Scheme, SHK Property Services Pension, Gilbert Trading Pension Scheme (CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5)Complainant: Ms Y, Mr S, Mr E, Mr Y, Mr GRespondent: Brambles Administration Limited (Brambles)
Mr Simon Hamilton Kaigh
Mr Michael McNally
Eleven Property Limited (Eleven Property)
SHK Property Services Limited (SHK Property Services)
Gilbert Trading Limited (Gilbert Trading)Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5Date: