Curtis Banks SIPP (PO-16890 and PO-17007)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
The applicants’ complaint against CB is partly upheld, but there is a part of the complaint I do not agree with. To put matters right (for the part that is upheld) CB should pay £750 for the additional loan interest of £750 that Mr I has incurred.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
The applicants have complained that they have been subject to poor administration and negligent advice by CB when purchasing a property for their SIPP.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Rowanmoor SSAS - Blick Horsham Limited Executive Pension Scheme (CAS-44560-Q1C8)Complainant: Mr KRespondent: Rowanmoor Group plc (Rowanmoor), including specifically its subsidiary
Rowanmoor Trustees Limited (RTL)Outcome: Partly upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-44560-Q1C8Date: - Westerby Private Pension (CAS-57893-P0C6)Complainant: Mr YRespondent: Westerby Trustee Services LimitedOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-57893-P0C6Date: