Skip to main content

Staveley Industries Retirement Benefits Scheme (PO- (PO-9061, PO-9059 and
PO-7262)

Complainant: Mr S, Mr E and Mr N (together the Additional Applicants)
Complaint Topic: Post retirement increases (escalation): general
Ref: PO-9061, PO-9059 and PO-7262
Outcome: Upheld
Appeal outcome: Upheld
Respondent: 1. SIRBS Pension Trustee Limited (the Trustee)
2. Staveley Industries Plc
3. PS Independent Trustee Limited
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:
Appeal: Yes

Ombudsman’s Determination

Complaint summary

  1. Mr S’s complaint against the Trustee, Staveley Industries Plc, the previous employer, and PS Independent Trustee Limited, the SIRBS manager is that his pension in payment increases were reduced to 3% per annum. He says that he is entitled to 5 % per anum increases as stipulated in the SIRBS rules.
  2. The Additional Applicants’ complaints set out above have been associated with Mr S’s complaint by my office. This means that the conclusions set out below in respect of Mr S’s case apply equally to the Additional Applicants. For clarity, there are differences in relation to the underlying facts for each individual but these have no material effect on the overall conclusion.

Summary of the Ombudsman’s decision and reasons

The complaint should be upheld. This is because Mr S is entitled to 5% increases, subject only to Inland Revenue limits which have now been repealed.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • British Steel Pension Scheme (CAS-45169-P1G3)
    Complainant: Mr S
    Respondent: British Steel Pension Fund Trustee Limited
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Post retirement increases (escalation): general
    Ref: CAS-45169-P1G3
    Date:
  • Nissan Pension Plan (CAS-78222-D2B8)
    Complainant: Mr N
    Respondent: Nissan Motor Manufacturing (UK) Ltd
    The Trustees of the Nissan Pension Plan
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Post retirement increases (escalation): general
    Ref: CAS-78222-D2B8
    Date: