We use some essential cookies to make this website work.

We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use our website, remember your settings and improve our services.

Before deciding you can read more about our cookies.

Halcrow Pension Scheme No.2 (PO-19912)

Complainant: Mr S
Complaint Topic: Administration
Ref: PO-19912
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: Halcrow Group Limited
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr S’ complaint and no further action is required by HGL.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr S’ complaint is that HGL, the sponsoring employer of HPS2, decided after the implementation of the Regulated Apportionment Arrangement (RAA) to merge other Defined Benefit (DB) schemes it sponsored into HPS2 and this compromised the security and value of his benefits.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • Selven Pension Scheme (CAS-45657-B7R7)
    Complainant: Mr R
    Respondent: Westbridge Pension Administration Limited
    Outcome: Partly upheld
    Complaint Topic: Administration
    Ref: CAS-45657-B7R7
    Date:
  • Westerby Private Pension (CAS-58612-P1X1)
    Complainant: Ms R
    Respondent: Westerby Trustee Services Limited
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Administration
    Ref: CAS-58612-P1X1
    Date:
View all decisions