Hargreaves Lansdown Vantage SIPP (PO-25132)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mr S’ complaint and no further action is required by Hargreaves Lansdown.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mr S has complained that the information he received from Hargreaves Lansdown, regarding his options when taking benefits from the SIPP, was insufficient. He says Hargreaves Landsdown should have provided him with more information about the “small pots” rule. He also says that Hargreaves Landsdown should have insisted that he take financial advice before making a decision.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Fee Paid Judicial Pension Scheme (CAS-45233-Y4G1)Complainant: Mr TRespondent: Ministry of Justice
XPS Pensions Consulting Limited
Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: Misquote/misinformationRef: CAS-45233-Y4G1Date: - Firemen’s Pension Scheme 1992 (CAS-84082-Y3B5)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: South Wales Fire & Rescue Authority
Rhondda Cynon Taff County Borough Council
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Misquote/misinformationRef: CAS-84082-Y3B5Date: