Skip to main content

The Pension Protection Fund (CAS-83901-H1T3)

Complainant: Mr H
Complaint Topic: Post retirement increases (escalation): general
Ref: CAS-83901-H1T3
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: The Board of the Pension Protection Fund
Type: Pensions Protection Fund complaint
Date:
Appeal: No

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The Board is not required to take any action in respect of this referral, because the Reconsideration Committee reached its decision correctly in accordance with the current legislation, namely the Pensions Act 2004, which does not provide for increases to benefits accrued before 6 April 1997.

Complaint summary

Mr H has referred an appeal of a decision that was issued by the Board’s Reconsideration Committee on 20 April 2021. Mr H’s referral is that the Board has not applied any annual increase to his PPF compensation which he is receiving in respect of service before 6 April 1997. Mr H says that this lack of indexation constitutes unlawful age discrimination, because it treats older members of the PPF less favourably than younger members.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • British Steel Pension Scheme (CAS-45169-P1G3)
    Complainant: Mr S
    Respondent: British Steel Pension Fund Trustee Limited
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Post retirement increases (escalation): general
    Ref: CAS-45169-P1G3
    Date:
  • Nissan Pension Plan (CAS-78222-D2B8)
    Complainant: Mr N
    Respondent: Nissan Motor Manufacturing (UK) Ltd
    The Trustees of the Nissan Pension Plan
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Post retirement increases (escalation): general
    Ref: CAS-78222-D2B8
    Date: