Skip to main content

Universities Superannuation Scheme (CAS-50740-F3M5 and CAS-38376-G3P7)

Complainant: Professor M
Complaint Topic: Interpretation of scheme rules/policy terms
Ref: CAS-50740-F3M5 and CAS-38376-G3P7
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:
Appeal: No

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold this complaint against USS as it has applied the Rules of the Scheme correctly and I do not find that Professor M relied on the Quotation in making his decision to withdraw from the Scheme.

Complaint summary

Professor M has complained that USS either misinterpreted the Scheme Rules in respect of the non-application of a Late Retirement Factor (LRF) to his entitlement or that the Scheme Rules are so drafted that they cannot be interpreted fairly.

He has also complained that a retirement quotation issued to him on 16 February 2016 (the Quotation) included a late retirement enhancement in the benefit figures but failed to explain that the enhancement would be lost were he to withdraw from the Scheme.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme (CAS-43565-P2H7)
    Complainant: Dr H
    Respondent: HSBC Bank Pension Trust (UK) Limited (the Trustee)
    Willis Towers Watson (WTW)
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Interpretation of scheme rules/policy terms
    Ref: CAS-43565-P2H7
    Date:
  • The People’s Pension (CAS-90317-K8N1)
    Complainant: Ms E
    Respondent: The People’s Pension Trustee Limited
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Interpretation of scheme rules/policy terms
    Ref: CAS-90317-K8N1
    Date: