Skip to main content

Royal London Group Pension Plan (PO-19400)

Complainant: Mr S
Complaint Topic: Death benefits
Ref: PO-19400
Outcome: Upheld
Respondent: Royal London Group
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Complaint Summary

Mr S’ complaint concerns Royal London’s decision not to exercise discretion in relation to the lump sum death benefit arising on his son’s death.

Mr S says Royal London ought to have explained to his son, Mr K, at the time he joined the GPP, that it was not a requirement for him to nominate a beneficiary for the death benefits, especially as he had no marriage plans in place. Mr S maintains that Royal London failed to fully explain to his son the implications of making his nomination, and the importance of keeping it up to date.

Summary of the Ombudsman’s Determination and reasons

The complaint should be upheld because Royal London failed to consider all potential beneficiaries within the classes defined in the applicable scheme rules. In doing so, it fettered its absolute discretion.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • London International Group UK Pension Scheme (CAS-65758-J8Q0)
    Complainant: Mrs R
    Respondent: Reckitt Benckiser Health Care UK Ltd

    Capital Cranfield Trustees Limited

    Mercer Limited
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Death benefits
    Ref: CAS-65758-J8Q0
    Date:
  • Policy 0899 (CAS-45703-Z2G6)
    Complainant: Mrs Y
    Respondent: Utmost Life and Pensions Limited
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Death benefits
    Ref: CAS-45703-Z2G6
    Date: