NHS Pension Scheme (PO-1902)
2. Waltham Forest Primary Care Trust (the “Trust”)
Subject
Mrs Guest complains that she agreed redundancy terms believing that Scheme benefits quoted to her were correct, when in fact they were overstated. She says that she would have acted differently if she had been given the correct information.
The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons
The complaint should not be upheld because I am not persuaded that Mrs Guest would have acted differently and because any perceived loss has in any event been nullified now.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Pension Protection Fund (CAS-87452-K9T5)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: The Board of the Pension Protection Fund (the Board)Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Misquote/misinformationRef: CAS-87452-K9T5Date:
- Aviva Staff Pension Scheme (CAS-53529-P0Z6)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: Aviva Staff Pension Trustee Limited (the Trustee)
XPS Administration (XPS)Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Misquote/misinformationRef: CAS-53529-P0Z6Date: