Suffolk Life Master SIPP (CAS-37412-G7F9)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mr Y’s complaint and no further action is required by Curtis Banks.
Complaint summary
Mr Y’s complaint is that Curtis Banks unreasonably required his investment manager to have professional indemnity insurance cover (PI cover) in place before he could reinvest funds within his SIPP account. He believes he was treated unfairly in this regard, and as a result he missed investment opportunities which resulted in him suffering a financial loss.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Ford Salaried Contributory Pension Fund (CAS-57216-C1M4)Complainant: Mrs ERespondent: Ford Pension Fund Trustees Limited (the Trustee)
Mercer Limited (Mercer)
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-57216-C1M4Date: - James Hay Modular Self-Invested Personal Pension (CAS-60018-C4V2)Complainant: Mr ERespondent: James Hay PartnershipOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-60018-C4V2Date: