Suffolk Life Master SIPP (CAS-37412-G7F9)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mr Y’s complaint and no further action is required by Curtis Banks.
Complaint summary
Mr Y’s complaint is that Curtis Banks unreasonably required his investment manager to have professional indemnity insurance cover (PI cover) in place before he could reinvest funds within his SIPP account. He believes he was treated unfairly in this regard, and as a result he missed investment opportunities which resulted in him suffering a financial loss.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (CAS-66992-S1V7)Complainant: Mr ERespondent: MyCSP
Cabinet Office
Ministry of JusticeOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-66992-S1V7Date: - GKN Group Pension Scheme No.1 (CAS-49476-Z4S2)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: The Trustee of GKN Group Pension Scheme No.1
MercerOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-49476-Z4S2Date: