Halcrow Pension Scheme No.2 (PO-19912)
Complainant: Mr S
Complaint Topic: Administration
Ref: PO-19912
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: Halcrow Group Limited
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mr S’ complaint and no further action is required by HGL.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mr S’ complaint is that HGL, the sponsoring employer of HPS2, decided after the implementation of the Regulated Apportionment Arrangement (RAA) to merge other Defined Benefit (DB) schemes it sponsored into HPS2 and this compromised the security and value of his benefits.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Rowanmoor SSAS - Blick Horsham Limited Executive Pension Scheme (CAS-44560-Q1C8)Complainant: Mr KRespondent: Rowanmoor Group plc (Rowanmoor), including specifically its subsidiary
Rowanmoor Trustees Limited (RTL)Outcome: Partly upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-44560-Q1C8Date: - Westerby Private Pension (CAS-57893-P0C6)Complainant: Mr YRespondent: Westerby Trustee Services LimitedOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-57893-P0C6Date: