Skip to main content
Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ms N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall make good any shortfall in units due to its late pension payments to the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £828.10 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr S is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ms Z’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £438.41 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Ms Z is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £5,133.76 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr S is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Local Government Pension Scheme - Leicestershire County Council Pension Fund (CAS-13268-Z7V8)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr Y’s complaint concerns the Council’s decision to refuse his application for early payment of retirement pension on ill health grounds.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £1,025.96 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr N is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Rival Services Limited Pension Scheme (CAS-51791-Q6B9)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The complaint should be upheld against CA because, but for its negligence, Mr S would not have suffered a financial loss. CA issued incorrect information to Mr S on more than one occasion, breaching its duty of care to Mr S and causing an unreasonable delay in the transfer of his occupational pension to his Fidelity SIPP.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

National Employment Savings Trust – NEST (CAS-104338-N6S4)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr A’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right the Employer shall pay the missing contributions in respect of this pension and make good any shortfall in units.

In addition, the Employer shall pay Mr A £1,000 for the serious distress and inconvenience it has caused him. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Spirit Legacy Pension Scheme (CAS-29191-V6G7)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Trustee shall carry out the instructions detailed in the section “Directions”.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ms Y’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right Ms Lovell shall ensure that all unpaid contributions are paid into the Scheme. Ms Lovell shall make sure that Ms Y is not financially disadvantaged by her maladministration.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Upheld