NEST (CAS-91982-L2X5)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Ms N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall make good any shortfall in units due to its late pension payments to the Scheme.
Ms N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall make good any shortfall in units due to its late pension payments to the Scheme.
Mr S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £828.10 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr S is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme.
Ms Z’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £438.41 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Ms Z is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme.
Mr S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £5,133.76 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr S is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration.
Mr Y’s complaint concerns the Council’s decision to refuse his application for early payment of retirement pension on ill health grounds.
Mr N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £1,025.96 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr N is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme.
The complaint should be upheld against CA because, but for its negligence, Mr S would not have suffered a financial loss. CA issued incorrect information to Mr S on more than one occasion, breaching its duty of care to Mr S and causing an unreasonable delay in the transfer of his occupational pension to his Fidelity SIPP.
Mr A’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right the Employer shall pay the missing contributions in respect of this pension and make good any shortfall in units.
In addition, the Employer shall pay Mr A £1,000 for the serious distress and inconvenience it has caused him.
Mrs S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Trustee shall carry out the instructions detailed in the section “Directions”.
Ms Y’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right Ms Lovell shall ensure that all unpaid contributions are paid into the Scheme. Ms Lovell shall make sure that Ms Y is not financially disadvantaged by her maladministration.