The Mizuho Bank London Final Salary Scheme (CAS-46519-B6Z4)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
The complaint should be partly upheld against the Trustee because:
The complaint should be partly upheld against the Trustee because:
Mr L’s complaint is partly upheld and, to put matters right for the part that is upheld, MyCSP and the Cabinet Office shall take the actions as set out in paragraph 71 below.
Dr Y’s complaint against SPPA is partly upheld. To put matters right, SPPA shall pay £1,000 to Dr Y in respect of the serious distress and inconvenience which he has suffered.
The complaint should be partly upheld against the Trustee because it should not have commenced the recovery of the overpayment without an order of a competent court.
Mr T’s complaint against the Employer and Mercer is partly upheld.
Mr R’s complaint against the Trustees is partly upheld. To put matters right the Trustees shall pay Mr R £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience caused to him.
Mrs Y’s complaint against NHS BSAis partly upheld.
The Applicants’ complaint is upheld in part, and to put matters right Hartley shall:
Mr S’ complaint against Curtis Banks is partly upheld. To put matters right, Curtis Banks shall pay Mr S interest on the pension contribution (the Contribution) that was transferred to Investec Wealth on 31 January 2020 (the Interest Amount).
Miss E’s complaint against Curtis Banks is partly upheld.