NU failed to provide Miss Drury with a complete response to her enquiry of 5 November 2003 about back contributions, which prevented Miss Drury from benefiting from the carry back of £3600.00 p.a. (gross) pension contribution to tax year 2002/3. Miss Drury believes that NU should compe …

Mr Durston has complained that the DfES or Teachers’ Pensions should have advised him about a restriction applicable to his salary for the purposes of calculating his pension. Some of the issues before me migh …

Mr Finlay said he was entitled to benefits that related to an intended transfer value made between th1. …

Mr Dixon complains that Scottish Amicable’s discontinuance charges were too high and that Prudential gave him misleading information about the charges. Some of the issues before me mig …

Mr Westwood complains that: He was forced to retire three business days after the scheme rules were amended which resulted in him receiving less favourable pension benefits; There was no qualifying period after the rule change; The Company and the Trustees acted immorally and without …

Mr Griffiths complains that he was not granted ill health early retirement (IHER) at the time his employment with the Company was terminated in December 2001. Mr Griffiths was granted early access to his preserved benefits in 2004 on the basis of i …

Mr Millington complains that the Trustees have calculated his early retirement pension incorrectly by using cost neutral early retirement factors instead of the more generous f …

Mr Devanney says that although presented with two medical reports that supported his claim for a full incapacity pension, the Trustees sought a further report which would support their desire to award only a partial incapacity pension and thus save costs. He claims that they had no valid rea …

Mr Sturgess and Mr Hutchinson say that Lincoln’s poor administration resulted in excessive delays in paying their pensions and pension benefits resulting in financial loss and additional professional costs. The two matters have much in common and I am …

Mr M says that the Ministry of Defence refuses to accept that he should be entitled to receive Service Invaliding Retired Pay or Service Attributable Retired Pay under the Scheme. Some of the issues before me might be seen as complaints of maladministration while others can be seen as disputes of fact or law …