Lindab Limited Group Stakeholder Pension Plan (CAS-82642-K3R2)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mrs Y’s complaint, and no action is required by Royal London.
I do not uphold Mrs Y’s complaint, and no action is required by Royal London.
I do not uphold Mr E’s complaint, and no further action is required by the Trustee or the Administrator.
The complaint should be partly upheld against Aviva and upheld against the Trustees.
The complaint is partly upheld against Aviva because: -
I partly uphold Mr S’ complaint and ReAssure shall pay Mr S £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience he has experienced less the £200 it has already paid him.
Mr R’s complaint against Mercer and the Trustee is partly upheld. To put matters right, Mercer shall pay Mr R £500 in recognition of the significant distress and inconvenience he suffered.
I do not uphold Dr H’s complaint, and no further action is required by Trustee or the Administrator.
The complaint is upheld because K Ltd has not presented any legal basis on which it was able to deny the transfer of Ms N’s benefits, nor has it given a reasonable explanation for the delay.
The complaint is upheld because S Ltd has not presented any legal basis on which it was able to deny the transfer of Ms N’s benefits, nor has it given a reasonable explanation for the delay.
I do not uphold Mrs W’s complaint, and no further action is required by Fidelity.
I do not uphold Mr H’s complaint, and no further action is required by Phoenix Life.