Skip to main content

Smiths Industries Pension Scheme (CAS-110689-M5K1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr S has complained that the increase applied to his Scheme pension in excess of the Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) from 1 May 2022 should have been 7.5% instead of the 5% increase that was actually awarded, in contradiction to a commitment made to members in August 1998. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

British Steel Pension Scheme (CAS-45169-P1G3)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr S’ complaint and no further action is required by the Trustee.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Nissan Pension Plan (CAS-78222-D2B8)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr N’s complaint and no further action is required by Nissan or the Trustee. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Hewlett-Packard Limited Retirement Benefits Plan – The Digital Section (CAS-43873-Q5Q2)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Appeal outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Hoover (1987) Pension Scheme (PO-23251)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman's Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr N's complaint and no further action is required by Hoover or the Former Trustee

Complaint Summary

Mr N's complaint is that he has lost pension benefits to which he was entitled under the Scheme when it entered the Pension Protection Fund's (PPF) assessment period.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Post retirement increases (escalation): general