Burlaw Retirement Benefits Scheme (PO-8348)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mr H’s complaint against Barclays is partly upheld, but there is a part of the complaint I do not agree with. To put matters right (for the part that is upheld) Barclays should pay £1,000 to Mr H.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained below.
Complaint summary
Mr H’s complaint against Barclays is that it incorrectly issued a cheque to him (from the Scheme) in his and his wife’s name, instead of in the Scheme’s name. Mr H says that he did not receive the replacement in time to invest the funds as he planned and he has suffered financial loss.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Prudential Additional Voluntary Contributions Scheme (CAS-68579-M6P0)Complainant: Mr NRespondent: PrudentialOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-68579-M6P0Date:
- Pension Protection Fund (CAS-119712-W0T6)Complainant: Mr YRespondent: The Board of the PPFOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-119712-W0T6Date: