Rettig UK Pension Scheme (PO-19073)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Complaint Summary
Mr A has complained that when a pension sharing order on divorce was made against him, KPMG transferred too much money from the Scheme to the pension arrangement of Mrs A, his ex-wife.
Summary of the Ombudsman’s Determination and reasons
The complaint should be upheld against KPMG because it transferred too much money from the Scheme to Mrs A’s pension arrangement, causing Mr A financial loss. In addition, he incurred legal costs that would not otherwise have been incurred, and should be compensated for those costs. Lastly, an award should be made to Mr A for the significant distress and inconvenience that KPMG has caused him.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- GEAPS Pension Scheme (CAS-52972-R9K3)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: Mercer Limited
The Trustee of the GEAPS Pension Scheme
Outcome: Partly upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-52972-R9K3Date: - TPS Benefits Scheme (CAS-95270-P0X8)Complainant: Dr HRespondent: Trustees of the TPS Benefits Scheme
Buck Consulting
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-95270-P0X8Date: