Ballylumford Power Pension Scheme (CAS-29744-V6F8)
2. Prudential
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mr N’s complaint and no further action is required by the Trustees or Prudential.
Complaint summary
Mr N has complained that his benefits were not correctly increased in the year before he took benefits. He considers that the pension should have been increased by the Retail Prices Index (RPI) on a pro rata basis until the date of his retirement.
Mr N says that had he known this would not be the case, he would have opted to transfer out of the Scheme or waited until the next revaluation date before taking benefits.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Pension Protection Fund (CAS-53012-H6M5)Complainant: Mr GRespondent: The Board Pension Protection FundOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Pre retirement increases (revaluation)Ref: CAS-53012-H6M5Date:
- The Caparo 1988 Pension Scheme (PO-21406)Complainant: Mr NRespondent: JLT Benefit Solutions Limited
Dalriada Trustees LimitedOutcome: Partly upheldComplaint Topic: Pre retirement increases (revaluation)Ref: PO-21406Date: