NEST (CAS-69459-K3D0)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mrs W’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall ensure that Mrs W is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. It shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme.
The Employer shall also pay Mrs W £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience it has caused her.
Complaint summary
Mrs W has complained that the Employer, despite deducting contributions from her pay, had failed to pay them into the Scheme.
Mrs W has said that the missing contributions amounted to approximately £1,000.
The Employer has now paid the contributions into the Scheme. However, Mrs W has complained that the Employer has failed to pay the investment returns due on the unpaid contributions.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- NEST Pension Scheme (CAS-111261-C9W2)Complainant: Mr NRespondent: Pod Design & Build LtdOutcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: Contributions: failure to pay into schemeRef: CAS-111261-C9W2Date:
- NEST Pension Scheme (CAS-99346-V1W9)Complainant: Mr TRespondent: Marshall Eaton Holdings LimitedOutcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: Contributions: failure to pay into schemeRef: CAS-99346-V1W9Date: