Pension Protection Fund (CAS-87352-D3M3)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Miss
Complaint summary
The PPFO has received a reference of a reviewable matter following a decision by the Board’s Reconsideration Committee dated 23 February 2022. The referral, brought by Miss K, representing her late father’s estate, is that the PPF failed to inform Mr K that he was able to take early retirement from age 55, and as a result he did not receive PPF compensation before he died.
Miss K has also complained that she suffered injustice. Miss K says she had to bear the costs of looking after Mr K and this had an adverse impact on her. This has not been accepted for investigation as it is not a relevant complaint of maladministration by the PPF. As applicable, a relevant complaint is defined in section 208(2)(a) of the Pensions Act 2004, as a complaint made “by a person who is or might become entitled to compensation under the pension compensation provisions………alleging that he has sustained injustice in consequence of maladministration in connection with any act or omission by the Board or any person exercising functions on its behalf.” As Miss K is not a person who is or might become entitled to compensation under the legislation governing the PPF, the PPFO is unable to accept Miss K’s complaint for losses she states she incurred personally.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Fidelity Self Invested Personal Pension (CAS-76954-G2W2)Complainant: Mr YRespondent: Fidelity InternationalOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-76954-G2W2Date:
- CSC Computer Sciences Limited Pension Scheme (CAS-61854-F9L4)Complainant: Ms YRespondent: DXC Pension Trustee Limited (the Trustee)
DXC (the Company)
Mercer
Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-61854-F9L4Date: