Police Pension Scheme (PO-7096)
2. Capita
Complaint summary
Mr Cherry’s complaint against the Commissioner and Capita relates to their failure to inform him of the tax penalties on his retirement benefits when taking subsequent re-employment.
Summary of the Ombudsman’s Determination and reasons
The complaint should be upheld against the Commissioner because it had a duty of care, as Mr Cherry’s employer, to have informed him of the tax implications of re -employment on his retirement benefits. Its failure to do so has led to Mr Cherry incurring tax charges on his retirement benefits.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Avis UK Pension Plan (CAS-38639-F6P7)Complainant: Mrs ERespondent: Avis Budget Group (the Employer)
XPS Administration (the Administrator)
Avis Pension Trustee Limited (the Trustee)
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructionsRef: CAS-38639-F6P7Date: - Railways Pension Scheme (CAS-72334-R9J9)Complainant: Mr BRespondent: The Railways Pension Trustee Company Limited
Railpen (formerly RPMI Limited)Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructionsRef: CAS-72334-R9J9Date: