Police Pension Scheme (PO-7096)
Mr Cherry’s complaint against the Commissioner and Capita relates to their failure to inform him of the tax penalties on his retirement benefits when taking subsequent re-employment.
Summary of the Ombudsman’s Determination and reasons
The complaint should be upheld against the Commissioner because it had a duty of care, as Mr Cherry’s employer, to have informed him of the tax implications of re -employment on his retirement benefits. Its failure to do so has led to Mr Cherry incurring tax charges on his retirement benefits.
- Complainant: Mr TRespondent: 1. GE Corporate (GE)
2. GE Pension Trustees Limited (the Trustees)Outcome: Not upheldTopic: Contributions: incorrect calculationRef: PO-17701Date:
- Complainant: The trustees of the DK Moriarty Limited Pension SchemeOutcome: Not upheldRef: PPF00096Date: