Police Pension Scheme (PO-7096)
Mr Cherry’s complaint against the Commissioner and Capita relates to their failure to inform him of the tax penalties on his retirement benefits when taking subsequent re-employment.
Summary of the Ombudsman’s Determination and reasons
The complaint should be upheld against the Commissioner because it had a duty of care, as Mr Cherry’s employer, to have informed him of the tax implications of re -employment on his retirement benefits. Its failure to do so has led to Mr Cherry incurring tax charges on his retirement benefits.
- Complainant: Mr NRespondent: The Trustees of the Innospec Limited Pension PlanOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructionsRef: PO-29382Date:
- Complainant: Mr ERespondent: BS Pension Fund Trustee LimitedOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructionsRef: PO-20048Date: