Skip to main content

Leafield Retirement Plan (PO-13826)

Complainant: Mr Y
Complaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructions
Ref: PO-13826
Outcome: Upheld
Respondent: Fast Pensions Limited
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr Y’s complaint is upheld, and to put matters right Fast Pensions should contact Mr Y to clarify his right to access his pension funds and any penalties that apply, and pay him £1,500 to reflect the distress and inconvenience caused to him by Fast Pensions’ maladministration. If Mr Y seeks to exercise a valid statutory right to a transfer value from the Plan to a named pension arrangement that is willing to accept it, Fast Pensions should pay the transfer value to that arrangement.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr Y complains that Fast Pensions has failed to respond to his enquiries about whether he can access his pension funds in the Plan under the new pension freedoms, or transfer his pension funds to another pension provider.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • Railways Pension Scheme (CAS-72334-R9J9)
    Complainant: Mr B
    Respondent: The Railways Pension Trustee Company Limited
    Railpen (formerly RPMI Limited)
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructions
    Ref: CAS-72334-R9J9
    Date:
  • Honeywell Retirement Plan (CAS-73456-S1Z4)
    Complainant: Mr R
    Respondent: Willis Towers Watson (WTW)
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructions
    Ref: CAS-73456-S1Z4
    Date: