Skip to main content

Curtis Banks Universal SIPP (CAS-38697-T1F1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs Y’s complaint is upheld, and to put matters right, Curtis Banks shall pay Mrs Y any additional costs that she incurred due to being required to open a new SIPP and for the late payment of service charges. Curtis Banks shall also pay Mrs Y £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience caused to her.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Fidelity Retail Pension Scheme (CAS-82915-B7C0)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr S’ complaint is upheld and to put matters right Fidelity shall pay £1,520.80 to Mr S.

In addition, the Employer shall pay Mr S £1,000 for the serious distress and inconvenience it has caused him, taking into account any amount already paid. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

The Jackson Manvers Limited Executive Pension Scheme (CAS-45541-T0B3)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The complaint is not upheld against Rowanmoor as Administrator, as it was not its responsibility to carry out the level of due diligence suggested by Mr N, and because it fulfilled the duties it did have in relation to the Scheme adequately. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme (CAS-80853-M0X7)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr H’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right Aegon and Willis Towers Watson shall: -

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Scottish Widows Workplace Pension Scheme (CAS-115117-N7N7)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs E’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £1,190.74 into the Scheme.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Eleven Property Pension Scheme, SHK Property Services Pension, Gilbert Trading Pension Scheme (CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Having fully considered the evidence and submissions presented in writing, I uphold the complaints against the Trustees and Brambles. My reasons are as follows. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

The Smart Pension Master Trust (CAS-114685-L7W7)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr W’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £2,792.27 into the Trust. The Employer shall ensure that Mr W is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Trust. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Genwick Retirement Benefit Scheme & Uniway Systems Retirement Benefits Scheme (PO-16266)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

  1. Dalriada and the Additional Applicants have submitted complaints that I have summarised as:-

View determination

Download

Related decisions

The Blackwell 1965 Ltd Executive Pension Scheme (PO-28733)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The complaint is not upheld against Rowanmoor as Administrator, as it was not its responsibility to carry out the level of due diligence suggested by Mr N, and because it fulfilled the duties it did have in relation to the Scheme adequately. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Olivetti UK Limited Pension and Life Assurance Scheme (CAS-50353-Y4X5)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The complaint/dispute is upheld against The Trustee and the Employer. 

There has been maladministration and breach of law by the Employer in:

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Upheld