Skip to main content
Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £886.21 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr S is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £176.31 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mrs S is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Aegon Section 32 buy-out Plan (CAS-32614-N3Z2)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr D’s complaint against Aegon is partly upheld. To put matters right, Aegon shall make a payment of £500 to Mr D, in respect of the significant non-financial injustice he has experienced. This is inclusive of the £300 that it has already offered him.

No further action is required by the Trustee.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Credit Suisse Group (UK) Pension Fund (CAS-87507-L4G3)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I uphold part, but not all, of this complaint. To put matters right for the part of the complaint that I uphold, the Trustee shall pay Mr R £500 in recognition of the significant distress and inconvenience caused.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs E’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay the missing contributions in respect of her pension and make good any shortfall in units. In addition, the Employer shall pay Mrs E £1,000 for the serious ­distress and inconvenience it has caused her.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

The People’s Pension (CAS-101648-K6L2)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ms N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay the missing contributions in respect of her pension and make good any shortfall in units. In addition, the Employer shall pay Ms N £1,000 for the serious distress and inconvenience it has caused her.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

DHL Group Retirement Plan (CAS-93337-Y2P1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr Y’s complaint and no further action is required by the Trustee or the Administrator. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £1,025.96 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr N is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Miss H’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £9,055.99 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Miss H is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Miss H’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £3,725.82 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Miss H is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and also paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Pension complaint or dispute