NEST (CAS-104011-B0F5)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Miss S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, Dapa Coffee shall pay Miss S £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience she has experienced.
Miss S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, Dapa Coffee shall pay Miss S £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience she has experienced.
Mrs L’s complaint against TP is partly upheld. To put matters right, TP shall repay Mrs L the overpayment it recovered from her and consider afresh whether to seek recovery of the overpayment.
I do not uphold Mrs R’s complaint and no further action is required by the Scheme Manager, the Trustee, or the Scheme Administrator.
I do not uphold Mr N’s complaint and no further action is required by WMPF.
I do not uphold Mrs Y’s complaint and no further action is required by Utmost.
The complaint is partially upheld against the Trustees. I am satisfied that:-
I do not uphold Mr B’s complaint and no further action is required by the Trustee or RPMI.
Ms D’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Administrator shall make good any financial loss it has caused Ms D. In addition, the Administrator shall pay Ms D £1,000 for the serious distress and inconvenience it has caused her.
I do not uphold Mr R’s complaint and no action is required by Aegon.
I do not uphold Ms S’ complaint and no further action is required by Royal London.