The Applicants ask me to determine whether their Scheme benefits should be calculated taking into account benefit augmentations purportedly granted in 1986 and/or 1987. They also ask me to determine the dates from which their Scheme benefits (whether augmented or not) became payabl …

Mr Hare’s complaint has two heads: He is aggrieved by the refusal of MPS to pay him an injury benefit from the Scheme. He was granted medical early retirement after he was dismissed from service b …

Mrs Hunt alleges that she was improperly persuaded by the Prudential’s sales representative to make Additional Voluntary Contributions (AVCs) to a policy with the Prudential. She was not advised by the representative that, as an alternative, she could pur …

Mrs Dickinson complains that Prudential’s sales representative improperly persuaded her to pay additional voluntary contributions (AVCs) to Prudential. She alleges that the representative led her to believe that an “in house” Prudential AVC polic …

Ms T complains that Brent Council refused to make any payment from the pension scheme following the death of her father, Mr P. Some of the issues before me might be seen as complaints of maladministration while others can be seen as disputes of fact or law and indeed, some may be both. I ha …

Mr Acheson complains about the decision not to award him temporary injury benefits under the Scheme. He says: CSP either poorly or wrongly interpreted the relevant …

Ms Bennett complains that the Trustees exercised their powers and discretion improperly by not awarding dependant’s benefits to her upon the death of Ms Darryl Newman, who was an active member of the Scheme. Ms Bennett says the decisio …

Mrs Symonds complains that Friends Provident refused to pay her a dependant’s pension. Some of the issues before me might be seen as complaints of maladministration while others can be seen as disput …

Mr McAvoy asserts that he was not properly considered for ill health retirement. Some of the issues before me might be seen as complaints of maladministration while others can be seen as disputes of fact or la …

Mr Appleyard claims that: the Trustee and SL gave him misleading information in 2000, in as much as it did not include a warning that his eventual benefits could be red …