Skip to main content

Scottish Housing Associations’ Pension Scheme (CAS-132784-G2D3)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Ms T’s complaint, and no further action is required by the Trustee or TPT. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Local Government Pension Scheme (CAS-74362-C5X1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr S’ complaint and no further action is required by the Council.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

NEST Pension Scheme (CAS-99346-V1W9)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr T’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £2,463.24 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr T is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. It shall also arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

HBOS Final Salary Pension Scheme (CAS-78486-R9D8)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mrs T’s complaint, and no further action is required by the Trustee. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

NEST Pension Scheme (CAS-111261-C9W2)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £1,064.58 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr N is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

ReAssure Personal Pension Plan (CAS-84909-V2W7)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The complaint should be upheld because L&G:-

  1. failed to identify and properly consider all potential beneficiaries eligible for death benefits under the Policy as defined in the Plan Rules; and

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Options Pension Scheme (CAS-93777-J8L3)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr N’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £6,945.54 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr N is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. It shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (CAS-73827-Z5V4)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr B’s complaint, and no further action is required by GCHQ. 

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

The Pearson Pension Plan (CAS-78909-Y1F5)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr L’s complaint, and no further action is required by Trustee.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Teachers’ Pension Scheme (CAS-63587-P0K4)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The complaint is upheld against TP because it provided Mr E with incorrect information which he relied on to his financial detriment. To put matters right, TP shall follow the steps set out in the section, ‘Directions’.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Pension complaint or dispute