Skip to main content

ReAssure Protected Rights Plan (CAS-99802-R7C9)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ms N’s complaint against Reassure is partly upheld. To put matters right, ReAssure shall pay Ms N an additional £600.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Rowanmoor SSAS - Blick Horsham Limited Executive Pension Scheme (CAS-44560-Q1C8)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The complaint is not upheld against Rowanmoor as Administrator, as it was not its responsibility to carry out the level of due diligence suggested by Mr K, and because it fulfilled the duties it did have in relation to the Scheme adequately. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Merlin Pension Scheme (CAS-74246-K7Q0)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr R’s complaint, and no further action is required by the Trustee or the Administrator. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

NEST Pension Scheme (CAS-112556-G7J4)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr D’s complaint is upheld and to put matters right the Employer shall pay £259.86 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr D is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Standard Life Staff Pension Scheme (CAS-83244-M3K3)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mrs R’s complaint, and no further action is required by SL or Aptia. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Standard Life Flexible Retirement Plan (CAS-49861-X5J5)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mrs N’s complaint, and no further action is required by SL. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Teachers' Pension Scheme (CAS-37350-K2Y4)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

  1. Mrs N’s complaint against TP and NYCC is partly upheld. To put matters right, Mrs N shall be paid £3,000 in respect of the non-financial injustice she has sustained as a consequence of their maladministration. £2,000 of this payment shall be made by TP and the remaining £1,000 by NYCC.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Smart Pension Master Trust (CAS-114171-Z6V8)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr l's complaint and no further action is required by Smart Pension. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

NEST Pension Scheme (CAS-116534-M8Y1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs K’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employers shall ensure that she is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, they shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

The Smart Pension Master Trust (CAS-94367-H8S2)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ms H’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £2,024.00 into the Trust. The Employer shall ensure that Ms H is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Trust. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Pension complaint or dispute