Skip to main content

MMC UK Pension Fund (CAS-69635-V3Q8)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome 

I do not uphold Mrs S’ complaint and no further action is required by Mercer or the Trustee. 

Complaint summary 

Mrs S has complained that in April 2019, the Fund’s administrator at the time confirmed she had received an overpayment that would need to be refunded and it subsequently provided poor service in response to the related enquiries and complaints she raised.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Police Pension Scheme (CAS-57022-H5Y8)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome 

I do not uphold Mr D’s complaint and no further action is required by the Constabulary. 

Complaint summary 

Mr D has complained that he should be allowed to retire early at age 50 but that this option is being incorrectly denied by the Constabulary on the basis that the career breaks he took are not recognised as qualifying service under the Scheme.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Scottish Housing Associations’ Pension Scheme (CAS-66581-S4T8)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination 

Complaint Summary

Mrs L has complained that the Trustee failed to administer the trust in accordance with the Scheme rules.

Summary of the Ombudsman’s Determination and reasons

The complaint is upheld against the Trustee for:

  • Maladministration and failure to distribute the lump sum death payment in accordance with the Scheme rules at the time of the Member’s death; and 
  • Breach of equitable duty of care.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Armed Forces Pension Scheme 2005 (CAS-82126-P3Y7)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome 

I do not uphold Mr G’s complaint and no further action is required by Veterans UK. 

Complaint summary 

Mr G has complained that he has not been awarded the appropriate tier of ill health retirement benefits. He contends that he should be awarded Tier 3 as he has been unable to work since 2018.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Firemen’s Pension Scheme 1992 (CAS-84085-R9H4)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The complaint is not upheld because I find that Mr S did not wholly rely on the information he was given by the Council preceding the misinformation, and to the extent that he did, it was not reasonable for him to have done so.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Firemen’s Pension Scheme 1992 (CAS-84082-Y3B5)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The complaint is not upheld because I find that Mr R would not have acted differently, had he not received the incorrect information.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Firemen’s Pension Scheme (1992) (CAS-84081-R5F2)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The complaint is partly upheld against the Authority because:-

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Local Government Pension Scheme (CAS-92761-H7Q6)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr L’s complaint and no further action is required by the Council.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Appeal outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome 

Mr R’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay Mr R £1,000 for the serious distress and inconvenience it has caused him.

Complaint summary 

Mr R has complained that the Employer, despite deducting contributions from his pay, had failed to pay into the Scheme. 

Mr R has said that the missing contributions amounted to over £2,000.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Pension complaint or dispute