Skip to main content

Hewlett-Packard Limited Retirement Benefits Plan: Digital Section (CAS-74325-Z1Q4)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr L’s complaint, and no further action is required by HPE.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Westerby Private Pension (CAS-57893-P0C6)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr Y’s complaint and no further action is required by Westerby. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Deloitte UK Pension Scheme , formerly known as the Deloitte & Touche UK Pension Scheme (D&TUKPS) (CAS-38437-Z8J7)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome 

The complaint should not be upheld against the Trustee because:-

  • No death benefits are payable to Ms N in respect of Mr T’s death under the Scheme Rules.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

The British Steel Pension Scheme (CAS-81940-Z2S8)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr D’s complaint and no further action is required by the Trustee. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

NHS Pension Scheme (CAS-71748-K5M5)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr S’ complaint and no further action is required by NHS BSA. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr Y's complaint, and no further action is required by the Employer.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Royal London Annuity (CAS-74345-R3Y7)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr S’ complaint and no further action is required by Royal London. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Miss R’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £899.40 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Miss R is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. It shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Smart Pensions (CAS-109231-Q6Q9)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Miss S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £3,000.06 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Miss S is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Miss K’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £1,835.92 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Miss K is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Pension complaint or dispute