Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr N’s complaint and no further action is required by MyCSP or SPS.

Complaint summary

Mr N’s complaint is that his application for a Permanent Injury Benefit (PIB) has not been properly considered. 

Mr N says there are five parts to his complaint. Namely:- 

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) Ombudsman has received a reference of a reviewable matter, following a decision by the Reconsideration Committee of the PPF dated 15 October 2008.

Mr Batt disagrees with the decision not to award him an ill health retirement pension. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should not be upheld against Royal Mail because they have reached their decision in an appropriate manner. DETAILED DETERMINATIO …

Reverend Bowman’s complaint was described by His Honour Judge Stewart QC in judicial review proceedings referred to further below and, in summary, is that: the Trustees, in December 1997, actually agreed in effect to pay his pension monies into the Scheme (unknown to him until December 2007) …

Mr A Grievson originally brought a complaint against Mr N Grievson as a trustee of the Scheme, Calberto Ltd, as principal employer of the Scheme and Brewin Dolphin as administrators of the Scheme. He complained that: the transfer valuation process was unfairly prejudicial; and the transfe …

Mr Shackleton has complained that his application for ill health early retirement has been prematurely closed. He has also complained that Scheme members have not been informed about changes to their pension rights. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reaso …

Mr Iles has complained that he has not been allowed to increase his entitlement under the AFPS75 and was required to join the Reserved Forces Pension Scheme (RFPS05) instead. Mr Iles has also complained that he was originally told that a peri …

The Pension Protection Fund Ombudsman has received a reference of a reviewable matter, following a decision, dated 15 June 2012, by the Reconsideration Committee (the Committee) of the Board of the Pension Protection Fund (the Board). The referral concerns the Scheme’s risk-based levy for the year 2011/12.