Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ombudsman's Determination

Outcome

The Applicants’ and Dalriada’s complaints are upheld. To put matters right, the Trustee, LD and Dalriada, shall comply with my directions as set out in paragraphs 388 to 394 of this Determination.

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mr N’s complaint is upheld against the Bradford & Bingley Trustees and to put matters right:

Mr Wade complains about the cessation of “pension” payments made to him for several years by the Company. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against the Company because: the payments made to Mr Wade were pursuant to an unfunded, occupation …

Mr Greenhalgh: disagrees with Safeway’s decision not to consent to augment his benefits; asserts that the Trustee could have proposed a more generous augmentation. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should …

Mr Roberts is unhappy with the way Countrywide has handled his claim for his benefits to be paid on grounds of triviality. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against Countrywide because they initially misinformed Mr Roberts that he was not …

Mr Sheppard ‘s principal complaint is that the Trustees and Artemis have wrongly refused to award him an early retirement pension due on his redundancy. He also complains that: Artemis failed to draft the Scheme Rules correctly; failed to inf …

Mr O’Reilly has complained about his UK Plan benefits not including a spouse’s pension. He contends that a promise that he should be no worse off on moving from the Republic of Ireland to the UK means he should benefit from subsequent improvements made to the Irish P …