Skip to main content

Safeway Pension Scheme (16295/3)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Mr Greenhalgh: disagrees with Safeway’s decision not to consent to augment his benefits; asserts that the Trustee could have proposed a more generous augmentation. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Irish Life Executive Pension Plan (78673/2)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr Roberts is unhappy with the way Countrywide has handled his claim for his benefits to be paid on grounds of triviality. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against Countrywide because they initially misinformed Mr Roberts that he was not …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Artemis (Closed) Pension Plan (76726/2)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Mr Sheppard ‘s principal complaint is that the Trustees and Artemis have wrongly refused to award him an early retirement pension due on his redundancy. He also complains that: Artemis failed to draft the Scheme Rules correctly; failed to inf …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Bausch & Lomb UK Pension Scheme (the UK Plan) (81619/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr O’Reilly has complained about his UK Plan benefits not including a spouse’s pension. He contends that a promise that he should be no worse off on moving from the Republic of Ireland to the UK means he should benefit from subsequent improvements made to the Irish P …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mrs X’s complaint is that Yell and the Trustees have not complied with the directions contained in the Determination of the previous Deputy Ombudsman in relation to her complaint (the 2009 Determination) because they: failed to explain how Yell could reasonably have …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Scottish Teachers’ Superannuation Scheme (80479/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Mrs Wright has complained that, The Council and the Prudential are responsible for a delay in the payment of her last additional voluntary contribution (AVC) into the Scheme, and The Council and the Prudential …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Safeway Pension Scheme (79177/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Mr Callaway complains that Safeway and the Trustee have refused to augment his pension as he had requested. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should not be upheld against Safeway or the Trustee because the …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr Anderson’s complaint is that: The Trustees have failed to comply with the directions contained in the Determination of the Deputy Pensions Ombudsman dated 6 July 2009 in relation to his complaint numbered 72831/1( the 2009 Determination) Yell could not reasonably …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Local Government Pension Scheme (80285/2)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr Jaszczyk complains that East Riding of Yorkshire Council (ERYC) his former employer and the administering authority in relation to the Scheme, wrongly turned down his application for early payment of the Scheme benefits on compassionate grounds and also did not deal with it on a timely ba …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Appeal outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Professor Parish claims: that he was not dismissed for reasons relating to his performance and that spurious reasons were given for his dismissal to deny him the enhanced pension to which he would otherwise have been entitled; the decision reached by NICE’s predecess …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Benefits: refusal/failure to pay or late payment