Prudential Flexible Retirement Plan (PO-12562)
2. Prudential
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mr Y’s complaint is upheld against FPOL. To put matters right it will contact Prudential to obtain a calculation of the difference in the value of the Plan, had Mr Y’s funds been invested as he requested. FPOL are then to pay the difference into Mr Y’s new plan (as the Plan with Prudential is now closed) in accordance with my directions set out in paragraphs 26 and 27 of this determination.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mr Y has complained that he has suffered a loss of investment growth because his funds were not invested with Prudential, as he requested on his application form.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Cobham Pension Plan (CAS-95920-X3H4)Complainant: Mr ERespondent: The Trustees of the Cobham Pension PlanOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructionsRef: CAS-95920-X3H4Date:
- NHS Pension Scheme (CAS-60994-H2H2)Complainant: Dr SRespondent: NHS Business Services AuthorityOutcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructionsRef: CAS-60994-H2H2Date: