Armed Forces Pension Scheme 1975 (PO-25248)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mr S’ complaint against Veterans UK is partly upheld, but there is a part of the complaint I do not agree with. To put matters right, for the part that is upheld, Veterans UK shall pay Mr S £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience he has suffered.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mr S is complaining that he has been denied the opportunity to take advantage of the “Life Commutation Scheme” and exchange (commute) some of his annual pension for a tax free lump sum. He also states he did not receive any literature informing him that the Scheme Rules had changed and removed this option.
Mr S is also unhappy that the Scheme’s website contained incorrect and misleading information which he says he relied upon when making certain financial decisions.
Mr S believes he has been financially disadvantaged by not being able to exchange some or all of his annual pension for a tax-free commutation lump sum of £79,368.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Royal London Annuity (CAS-74345-R3Y7)Complainant: Mr SRespondent: Royal LondonOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Benefits: refusal/failure to pay or late paymentRef: CAS-74345-R3Y7Date:
- The Johnson & Johnson UK Group Retirement Plan (CAS-12388-L3Z2)Complainant: Mr YRespondent: Johnson & Johnson Consumer UK LimitedComplaint Topic: Benefits: refusal/failure to pay or late paymentRef: CAS-12388-L3Z2Date: