Thomas Cook UK DC Pension Scheme (CAS-75043-G1Y2)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mrs N’s complaint is partly upheld. I do not find that Aviva or the Trustee need to take any further action at present.
Mrs N’s complaint is partly upheld. I do not find that Aviva or the Trustee need to take any further action at present.
Mr N’s complaint is partly upheld. To put matters right, Aviva shall follow the actions set out in the section, “Directions”.
Mr L’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £3,988.60 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr L is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme.
Ms I’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay Ms I £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience it has caused her.
I do not uphold Mr N’s complaint and no further action is required by the Trustee.
Mr L’s complaint is upheld, and to put matters right, Amnesty shall:
Mr T’s complaint against CB is partly upheld. To put matters right, CB shall pay Mr T £1,000 in recognition of the serious distress and inconvenience he has experienced as a result of its maladministration.
I do not uphold Mrs S’ complaint and no further action is required by NHS BSA.
Mr D’s complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £279.97 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Mr D is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme.
I do not uphold Mr S’ complaint and no further action is required by Heidelberg Materials UK or Forterra.