Mrs Hassell-Roberts has complained that SCC have failed to properly consider her for ill health early retirement The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against SCC because they failed to obtain the information t …

Royal Mail Pension Trustees Ltd and Royal Mail Pension Service Centre, together with Phoenix Limited delayed completing the transfer of Mr Entwistle’s benefits. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short …

Mrs D has complained that she was incorrectly awarded a tier 3 ill health retirement pension because the independent medical adviser did not have a report from a consultant psychiatrist and this meant she could not later be awarded a tier 1 pension at t …

Miss Carden-Jones disagrees with the Council’s decision not to award her ill-health retirement benefits from active service. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against the Council because: independent advice …

Miss Pedder disagrees with TPs’ decision not to award her a child’s benefit from the TPS. She claims that she qualifies under the relevant regulations and TP have dismissed her claim without proper investigation. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against TP …

Mr Kelly complains that Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust, (the Probation Trust) and WMPF incorrectly determined the level of his ill-health benefits in 2009 and that his pension…

Dr Winterbotham has complained that LCC have not considered his request for the early payment of his deferred benefits on the grounds of ill health properly. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against LCC because they did not take steps to …

Mr Ring disagrees with the decision of NHSBSA not to award him Permanent Injury Benefits (PIB) from the Scheme. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against NHSBSA because they have not properly considered whether Mr Ring has incurred a Perm …

The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) Ombudsman has received a reference of a reviewable matter, following a decision by the Reconsideration Committee of the PPF dated 28 February 2012. The referral concerns the Scheme’s risk-based levy for the 2011/2012 levy year, which is a reviewable matter under paragraph 19 of Schedule 9 of the Pensions Act 2004.

Mr Batt complains of the loss of his investment as a result of the transfer of his funds from Scottish Equitable plc tothe Co-operative Insurance Society Limited. not being completed.. …